Jump to content
EleTD.com

Kaini

Registered
  • Content Count

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kaini


  1. and something to helparound for leakcatchng.. for 16k?

    You are right, 16k is much in non-random. But in this mode you must not play towers at a slower position than 3, I think there is a strong long range tower at 5 a nice workaround. :wink:

    (have you seen me play VH SR? It's very...hectic)

    No, but I am looking for a replay. I play more... composed. (I really like LEO :P)

    I took T3 because holepercent sayed in the beginning higher is better. He is right, if nobody pick T1 (but someone T2 or nobody T2 but somebody T1) we'll all get T1 and T2.

    I have to ask again: Why not? If nobody pick the two darkness left we won't get Darkness 3 ;)

    PS: Diplomacy is funny!


  2. I really like pure darkness, it is something like a rescue tower, and magic is cool too! Gunpowder is a rescue tower too - and a perfect workaround for light, because darkness would fail.

    (don't quote me on this though, I haven't really used lvl 3 magic towers at all).

    I never played Magic 3, but Magic 2 is nice...

    It may be good draft strategy to start with something like fire/water/earth tier3. Tier3s and tier2s usually make good choices for the first few picks.

    So... why not? :P


  3. stopped-attac-bug:

    Yep I had it today too. It's a pitty that i've lost the replay :S It happened with tree of four Muhsroom-towers.

    crash-bug:

    One time this happened to nullnullnixx an me. I (host) was yellow and he (joined) was blue. Everybody of us took vh-sr-sm-normal-normal, then the game crashed without a message box. It simply crashed.


  4. maybe a minor improvement would be to put the box/the choice "samerandom" over allrandom, in the dialog boxes to make it chosen more often, IF we wan't it to be chosen more often. Imo, I think too few host try samerandom. All random is still far from fair.

    That sounds very good!


  5. I think random mode should get more fair.

    My Idea:

    :arrow: every -random player gets the same elements

    :arrow: -samerandom will be abolished

    :arrow: the old -allrandom will be renamed to -funrandom

    :arrow: the new -allrandom is like -samerandom.

    What do you think about that?

×
×
  • Create New...