Brule Posted April 25, 2009 was not suppose to be 4.1 Beta1 instead 4.0 beta 24? Go to top Share this post Link to post
Kaini Posted April 25, 2009 I guess "4.0 beta 24" is more secure because if it is leaked nobody will care about it because 4.0 final is already here. Go to top Share this post Link to post
echinodermata Posted April 25, 2009 on the other hand, a lot of our original beta reports were just labeled [beta 1], [beta 2], ... , so we could just call it 4.1 beta 24 despite that the 23 preceding numbers were for 4.0. Go to top Share this post Link to post
Brule Posted May 12, 2009 i think this can be moved to implemented ideas already, no need to stay here anymore ^^ Go to top Share this post Link to post